The Journey of Far-Right Meme to Anti-ICE Icon: This Unexpected Story of the Frog

This revolution isn't broadcast, yet it might possess webbed feet and protruding eyes.

It also might feature a unicorn's horn or a chicken's feathers.

As protests against the government continue in US cities, protesters are utilizing the energy of a community costume parade. They've offered dance instruction, handed out snacks, and performed on unicycles, while officers observe.

Mixing humour and politics – a strategy social scientists term "tactical frivolity" – has historical precedent. Yet it has transformed into a signature characteristic of US demonstrations in the current era, adopted by both left and right.

A specific icon has risen to become particularly salient – the frog. It originated when video footage of an encounter between a protester in a frog suit and immigration enforcement agents in the city of Portland, went viral. It subsequently appeared to demonstrations throughout the United States.

"A great deal going on with that humble frog costume," says an expert, who teaches at University of California, Davis and an academic who specialises in political performance.

The Path From Pepe to Portland

It is difficult to examine demonstrations and amphibians without addressing Pepe, a cartoon character adopted by extremist movements during an election cycle.

As the character initially spread on the internet, people used it to convey specific feelings. Afterwards, it was deployed to endorse a political figure, including one notable meme retweeted by the candidate personally, portraying the frog with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

The frog was also portrayed in digital spaces in offensive ways, as a hate group member. Online conservatives exchanged "rare Pepes" and established digital currency using its likeness. His catchphrase, "feels good, man", became a coded signal.

However its beginnings were not as a political symbol.

Its creator, the illustrator, has stated about his disapproval for its co-option. His creation was meant as simply an apolitical figure in this artist's universe.

This character first appeared in comic strips in 2005 – apolitical and famous for a particular bathroom habit. In a documentary, which follows Mr Furie's efforts to wrest back control of his work, he said the character came from his experiences with friends and roommates.

As he started out, Mr Furie experimented with uploading his work to the nascent social web, where the community began to copy, alter, and reinterpret the frog. As Pepe spread into darker parts of online spaces, the creator attempted to distance himself from his creation, including ending its life in a final panel.

But Pepe lived on.

"This demonstrates that creators cannot own icons," states the professor. "They can change and shift and be reworked."

Previously, the association of this meme resulted in frogs were largely associated with the right. But that changed in early October, when an incident between an activist wearing a blow-up amphibian suit and an immigration officer in Portland, Oregon captured global attention.

The moment occurred shortly after an order to send the National Guard to Portland, which was called "war-ravaged". Activists began to gather in droves on a single block, near a federal building.

Emotions ran high and an immigration officer deployed a chemical agent at a protester, aiming directly into the air intake fan of the puffy frog costume.

Seth Todd, Seth Todd, responded with a joke, remarking it tasted like "something milder". Yet the footage became a sensation.

The frog suit was not too unusual for the city, known for its unconventional spirit and activist demonstrations that delight in the absurd – outdoor exercise, retro fitness classes, and nude cycling groups. The city's unofficial motto is "Embrace the Strange."

This symbol was also referenced in subsequent court proceedings between the federal government and the city, which claimed the deployment was unlawful.

Although the court ruled in October that the administration had the right to deploy troops, a minority opinion disagreed, noting in her opinion demonstrators' "well-known penchant for wearing chicken suits while voicing their disagreement."

"Observers may be tempted the majority's ruling, which adopts the description of Portland as a battlefield, as merely absurd," she stated. "But today's decision goes beyond absurdity."

The deployment was halted by courts soon after, and personnel have reportedly departed the city.

But by then, the frog had become a significant symbol of resistance for the left.

The costume was spotted in many cities at No Kings protests that fall. Amphibian costumes were present – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in San Diego and Atlanta and Boston. They were in small towns and big international cities abroad.

This item was backordered on online retailers, and saw its cost increase.

Mastering the Optics

What brings both frogs together – lies in the dynamic between the silly, innocent image and underlying political significance. Experts call this "tactical frivolity."

The tactic relies on what the professor calls a "disarming display" – frequently absurd, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" act that highlights a cause without needing obviously explaining them. This is the unusual prop used, or the symbol you share.

The professor is an analyst on this topic and a veteran practitioner. He's written a book on the subject, and led seminars internationally.

"You could go back to historical periods – when people are dominated, they use absurdity to express dissent indirectly and while maintaining plausible deniability."

The theory of this approach is three-fold, Mr Bogad says.

As protesters confront a powerful opposition, humorous attire {takes control of|seizes|influences

Jennifer Klein
Jennifer Klein

A mindfulness coach and writer passionate about helping others find balance and clarity in a fast-paced world.