🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series did not happen during the nail-biting finale last Saturday, when her squad executed one dramatic comeback feat after another before prevailing in overtime against the opposing team.

It came a game earlier, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a thrilling, game-winning play that at the same time challenged numerous negative misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in the past decades.

The moment itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he at first misjudged in the bright lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, game-winning out. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a runner collided with him, knocking him to the ground.

This wasn't merely a great athletic achievement, perhaps the key turn in the series in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for most of the series like the underdog side. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed uplift for Latinos and for Los Angeles after months of enforcement actions, security forces monitoring the neighborhoods, and a constant drumbeat of criticism from national leaders.

"The players presented this counter-narrative," explained Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a distinct kind of confidence. They are bombastic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and pursued. It's so easy to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter these days – for Molina or for the legions of other fans who show up faithfully to matches and fill up as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand seats each time.

The Complicated Connection with the Team

When aggressive enforcement operations started in Los Angeles in June, and military troops were deployed into the area to react to resulting protests, two of the city's sports clubs promptly issued messages of solidarity with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers want to steer clear of political issues – a view influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a significant minority of the fans, including Latinos, are followers of current political figures. Under considerable external demands, the team later pledged $one million in aid for individuals directly affected by the operations but made no official condemnation of the government.

Official Event and Past Legacy

Months before, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an offer to mark their 2024 championship victory at the White House – a move that sports writers described as "disappointing … spineless … and hypocritical", considering the team's pride in having been the first major league franchise to end the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that history and the principles it represents by executives and present and former players. Several players including the coach had voiced reluctance to go to the White House during the first term but then reconsidered or gave in to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Dilemmas

An additional issue for fans is that the team are owned by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose equity holdings, as per sources and its own published financial documents, include a stake in a private prison corporation that runs detention facilities. The group's executives has said many times that it aims to stay out of political matters, but its detractors say the inaction – and the financial stake – are their own form of acquiescence to current policies.

All of that contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Latino supporters in especial – sentiments that emerged even in the euphoria of this year's hard-won championship triumph and the following outpouring of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Can one to support the team?" local columnist Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an thoughtful article pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but doubt in our minds". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man boycott must have given the squad the fortune it needed to win.

Distinguishing the Team from the Owners

Many fans who share similar misgivings appear to have concluded that they can keep to support the players and its roster of global players, including the Asian megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the team's business leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on the following day, when the capacity crowd roared in approval of the manager and his athletes but booed the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in suits don't get to take our players from us," the fan said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Past Context and Community Impact

The problem, though, runs deeper than only the organization's present proprietors. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s involved the municipality razing three low-income Hispanic neighborhoods on a elevated area above downtown and then transferring the land to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A song on a mid-2000s album that chronicles the story has an low-income parking attendant at the stadium revealing that the house he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly the region's most widely followed Mexican American columnist and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the long, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.

"They've put one arm around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the team over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the awkward fact that turnout at home games did not dip, even at the height of the protests when the city center was under to a nightly curfew.

International Stars and Community Bonds

Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {