🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated controversy over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the federal government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the cost of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered first-hand.

She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with contrasting temperaments.

“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a background of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the park links to expected lifespan, but which advocates say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but earlier asserted: “The whales … receive far better medical attention and constant attention than any human in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed information of the incident were shared to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, equipment and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for calls for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to China.

“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reveal a more general lack of awareness of the circumstances of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a important part of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the near future.

An official, head of the plan, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|