🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.