🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.